A codec is not a format, and there may be multiple codecs that implement the same compression specification – for example, MPEG-1 codecs typically do not achieve quality/size ratio comparable to codecs that implement the more modern H.264 specification. The quality the codec can achieve is heavily based on the compression format the codec uses. Price (value for money, volume discounts, etc.).Supported interfaces (VfW, DirectShow, etc.).Type of license (commercial, free, open source).General software characteristics – for example:.Performance characteristics such as compression/decompression speed, supported profiles/options, supported resolutions, supported rate control strategies, etc.Video quality comparisons can be subjective or objective. Commonly video quality is considered the main characteristic of codec comparisons. Video quality per bitrate (or range of bitrates).The following characteristics are compared in video codecs comparisons: However, there are also several other factors that can be used as a basis for comparison. The primary goal for most methods of compressing video is to produce video that most closely approximates the fidelity of the original source, while simultaneously delivering the smallest file-size possible. A variety of technologies soon emerged to do so. Shortly after the compact disc became widely available as a digital-format replacement for analog audio, it became feasible to also store and use video in digital form. The compression may employ lossy data compression, so that quality-measurement issues become important. Most codecs are typically implementations of video coding formats. Α video codec is software or a device that provides encoding and decoding for digital video, and which may or may not include the use of video compression and/or decompression.
0 kommentar(er)
